§ 10. Enforcement of a sentence of imprisonment in Norway

The Ministry may consent to a sentence of imprisonment imposed by the Court being served in Norway, and may request the prosecuting authority to commence enforcement. Enforcement is to be effected in accordance with the provisions of Part 10 of the Statute of Rome and the conditions attached by the Ministry to accepting the sentenced person for serving the sentence.

Part I. General Provisions

Chapter 2. Penalties and other sanctions

Section 17. Imprisonment may be imposed :

(a) for a term of from 14 days to 15 years, or in the cases dealt with in sections 60 a, 61 and 62 for a term not exceeding 20 years ;
(b) in cases in which it is specially provided, for a term not exceeding 21 years.

Any provision for imprisonment in this code means imprisonment for a limited period unless it is otherwise expressly stated.

A person sentenced to imprisonment may be released on probation in accordance with the provisions of a special Act (section 26).

Sections 18-19. (Repealed by Act of 12 December 1958 No. 1.)

Section 20. (Repealed by Act of 12 June 1981 No. 62.)

Section 21.

Should a person who is serving detention be sentenced to imprisonment, the execution of the latter sentence would normally commence immediately and the other sentence would be temporarily suspended.

Section 22.

Detention may be imposed for a term of from 14 days to 20 years.

Two days' detention shall be considered the equivalent of one day's imprisonment.

Section 23.

On the application of the convicted person or with his consent, detention may be converted to imprisonment.

Section 24.

When imprisonment is specified as the only form of custodial penalty, an equivalent sentence of detention may be imposed, provided that special circumstances make it probable that the act did not originate from a depraved mind.

Section 25.

A custodial sentence not exceeding four months shall be determined in days; a custodial sentence exceeding four months shall be determined in months and years.

Section 26.

Further provisions for the execution of sentences of imprisonment, community sentences, special criminal sanctions and preventive detention shall be made in a separate Act.

Section 26 a.

In addition to a custodial sentence the court may impose a fine. This applies even though fines are not prescribed as a penalty for the offence. In assessing a custodial sentence the fact that a fine is also imposed shall be taken into account.

The power to combine a custodial sentence with a fine derived from this section is of no significance in relation to statutory provisions that give legal effect to the penalty limits.

Section 27.

When a fine is imposed, due consideration should be given not only to the nature of the offence but also especially to the financial position of the convicted person and to what he can presumably afford to pay in his circumstances.

The fine shall accrue to the State treasury.

Section 28.

When a fine is imposed, a sentence of imprisonment of from one day to three months, or in the cases mentioned in section 63 up to four and a half months, shall be stipulated, which shall be executed if the fine is not paid.

When a fine is imposed pursuant to section 48 a, no sentence of imprisonment pursuant to the first paragraph shall be stipulated.

Part I. General Provisions

Chapter 2. Penalties and other sanctions

Section 26 a.

In addition to a custodial sentence the court may impose a fine. This applies even though fines are not prescribed as a penalty for the offence. In assessing a custodial sentence the fact that a fine is also imposed shall be taken into account.

The power to combine a custodial sentence with a fine derived from this section is of no significance in relation to statutory provisions that give legal effect to the penalty limits.

Section 27.

When a fine is imposed, due consideration should be given not only to the nature of the offence but also especially to the financial position of the convicted person and to what he can presumably afford to pay in his circumstances.

The fine shall accrue to the State treasury.

Section 28.

When a fine is imposed, a sentence of imprisonment of from one day to three months, or in the cases mentioned in section 63 up to four and a half months, shall be stipulated, which shall be executed if the fine is not paid.

When a fine is imposed pursuant to section 48 a, no sentence of imprisonment pursuant to the first paragraph shall be stipulated.

Part I. General Provisions

Chapter 2. Penalties and other sanctions

Section 34.

Any proceeds of a criminal act shall be confiscated. Such liability may, however, be reduced or remitted in so far as the court is of the opinion that confiscation would clearly be unreasonable. Confiscation may be effected even though the offender cannot be punished because he was not accountable for his acts (sections 44 or 46) or did not manifest guilt.

Any asset that takes the place of the proceeds, profit and other benefits of the proceeds shall be regarded as proceeds. Expenses incurred shall not be deducted. If the amount of the proceeds cannot be established, the court will determine the amount approximately.

Instead of any asset an amount equivalent to the value thereof or to part of the said value may be confiscated. It may be stipulated in the sentence that the asset shall serve as security for the amount to be confiscated.

Confiscation shall be effected from the person to whom the proceeds have directly accrued by the criminal act. Basically it shall be assumed that the proceeds have accrued to the offender unless he proves on a balance of probabilities that they have accrued to another person.

Section 34 a.

Extended confiscation may be effected when the offender is found guilty of a criminal act of such a nature that the proceeds thereof can be considerable, and he has committed

a) one or more criminal acts that may collectively be punishable by imprisonment for a term of six years or more, or an attempt at such an act, or
b) at least one criminal act punishable by imprisonment for a term of two years or more, or an attempt at such an act, and the offender during the five years immediately preceding the commission of the said act has been punished for an act of such a nature that the proceeds thereof can be considerable.

Any increase of the penalty limits in the event of repetition shall not be taken into account.

In the event of extended confiscation all assets belonging to the offender may be confiscated unless he proves on a balance of probabilities that the said assets have been lawfully acquired. Section 34, third paragraph, shall apply correspondingly.

In the event of extended confiscation from the offender the value of all assets belonging to the offender's present or previous spouse may also be confiscated unless

a) they have been acquired before the marriage was entered into or after the marriage was dissolved,
b) they have been acquired at least five years before the criminal act that provides a basis for extended confiscation, or
c) the offender proves on a balance of probabilities that the assets have been acquired otherwise than by the criminal acts he has committed.

When two persons are living together permanently in a marriage-like relationship, this shall be deemed equivalent to marriage.

Section 35.

Objects that have been produced by or been the subject of a criminal act may be confiscated if this is considered necessary for the purpose of the provision that prescribes the penalty for the act. Rights and claims are also deemed to be objects. The provision in section 34, first paragraph, third sentence, shall apply correspondingly.

The same applies to objects that have been used or intended for use in a criminal act.

Instead of the object an amount equivalent to its value or part of its value may be confiscated. It may be stipulated in the sentence that the object shall serve as security for the amount confiscated.

Instead of confiscating the object the court may impose measures to prevent the object being used for the commission of new offences.

Section 36.

Confiscation pursuant to section 35 may be effected from the offender or from the person on whose behalf he has acted.

Confiscation of any object mentioned in section 35, second paragraph, or of an amount that is wholly or partly equivalent to its value may also be effected from an owner who has or should have understood that the object was to be used for a criminal act.

Section 37.

A right that is legally secured on an object that is confiscated shall lapse to the extent provided in the sentence in the case of the holder of a right who is himself guilty of the criminal act, or on whose behalf the offender has acted. The provision in section 34, first paragraph, third sentence, shall apply correspondingly.

Such provision may also be made in the case of the holder of a right who, when the right was established, understood or should have understood that the object was to be used in a criminal act, or that it could be confiscated.

When an object is sold with the ownership reserved to the seller, the purchaser shall be deemed to be the owner and the seller the holder of a right in applying the provisions of this section.

Section 37 a.

When any proceeds or object mentioned in section 34 or 35 is after the commission of the offence transferred from a person from whom confiscation may be effected, what has been transferred or its value may be confiscated from the receiver if the transfer has occurred as a gift or if the receiver understood or should have understood the connection between the criminal act and what has been transferred to him.

If extended confiscation may be effected pursuant to section 34 a and the offender has transferred any asset to one of his next-of-kin, the said asset or its value may be confiscated from the receiver if the prosecuting authority proves on a balance of probabilities that it has been acquired by a criminal act committed by the offender.

If the assets of any person referred to in section 34 a, third paragraph, are wholly or partly taken into account in the event of confiscation from the offender, and the said person meets his or her liability pursuant to this section, the offender's liability shall be correspondingly reduced. If the offender has met his liability pursuant to section 34 a, second paragraph, any further contribution from him will lead to the receiver's liability being correspondingly reduced.

The second paragraph shall apply correspondingly in the event of the transfer of an enterprise if the offender

a) alone or together with any person referred to in the second paragraph owns a substantial part of the enterprise,
b) receives a considerable part of the income of the enterprise, or
c) by virtue of his position as head thereof has substantial influence over it.

The same shall apply to any right which was established in the object after the commission of the offence by any person from whom confiscation may be effected.

Part I. General Provisions

Chapter 2. Penalties and other sanctions

Section 37 d.

The proceeds of any confiscation shall accrue to the State treasury unless it is otherwise provided.

In its judgment or by a subsequent order made by the District Court that decided the issue of confiscation, the court may decide that the proceeds of any confiscation may be applied to covering any claim for compensation made by the aggrieved person.

The Ministry may decide that the proceeds of any confiscation shall be divided between the Norwegian State and one or more other States. In the decision importance shall be attached to, inter alia, what expenses have been incurred in such States and in which countries harmful effects have occurred and the proceeds were acquired. Any division pursuant to this paragraph may not result in any reduction of the covering of the aggrieved person's claim for compensation pursuant to the second paragraph.

When proceeds have been confiscated pursuant to section 34, and the convicted person or someone who is responsible for the harm done has paid compensation to the aggrieved person after the date of adjudication, the court may at the request of the convicted person decide that the amount confiscated shall be reduced correspondingly. The same applies if the convicted person pays tax or duty corresponding to the amount confiscated. Any request pursuant to this paragraph must be submitted to the court not later than one year after the decision concerning confiscation becomes legally enforceable.

Section 22.Intent

Intent exists when a person commits an act that fits the description of the offence in a penal provision

Intent exists even if the offender is unaware that the act is unlawful, see section 26.

Section 23.Negligence

Any person who acts in contravention of the requirement of due care in an area of life, and who17. Imprisonment may be held to blame in view of his or her personal circumstances, is negligent.

The negligence is gross if the act is highly reproachable and there are grounds for significant blame.

Section 24.Unintended consequence

An unintended consequence is part of the assessment of whether an offence is aggravated if the offender has acted negligently with regard to the consequence or failed to prevent the consequence according to ability after becoming aware that it might occur.

Section 25.Factual ignorance

All persons shall be judged based on their perception of the factual situation at the time of the act.

If the ignorance is negligent, the act is subject to a penalty when negligent violation of the law is punishable.

Ignorance as a result of self-induced intoxication is disregarded. In such cases the offender is judged as if he/she were sober. The same applies if the person was in a self-induced state of unaccountability.

Section 26.Ignorance of the law

Any person who at the time of the act is unaware that the act is unlawful due to ignorance of legal rules shall be penalised if the ignorance is negligent.

Chapter 4. Enterprise penalties

Section 27.Penalties for enterprises

When a penal provision is violated by a person who has acted on behalf of an enterprise, the enterprise is liable to punishment. This applies even if no single person meets the culpability or the accountability requirement, see section 20.

«Enterprise» means a company, co-operative society, association or other organisation, sole proprietorship, foundation, estate or public body.

The penalty is a fine. The enterprise may also be sentenced to lose the right to operate, or may be prohibited from operating in certain forms, see section 56, and be subject to confiscation, see chapter 13.

Section 28.Factors in determining whether a penalty shall be imposed on an enterprise:

In determining whether an enterprise shall be penalised pursuant to section 27, and in assessing the penalty, considerations shall include

Chapter 5. Overview of the criminal sanctions

Section 29.The penalties

Section 34, second and third paragraphs, and sections 35 to 39 apply correspondingly insofar as applicable. However, section 39, second paragraph, fifth sentence, does not apply.

Section 61.Waiver of sentencing

Even if guilt is deemed proven, the court may, when exceptional reasons so warrant, waive sentencing.

In deciding whether exceptional circumstances apply, particular weight shall be given to whether imposing a sentence will have the effect of an unreasonable additional burden on the offender, provided that the purpose and effects of the penalty in general do not indicate that a sanction should be imposed.

Section 60, second paragraph, applies correspondingly.

Chapter 12. Committal to psychiatric care and committal to care

Section 62.Conditions for committal to psychiatric care

An offender who is unaccountable pursuant to section 20, second to fourth paragraphs, may be committed to psychiatric care by court order when he or she has committed or attempted to commit an offence that violates another person's life, health or freedom or that might endanger these legal interests, the special sanction is necessary to protect society, and the risk of another serious violation of someone's integrity seems likely.

An offender who is unaccountable pursuant to section 20, second to fourth paragraphs, may also be committed to psychiatric care by court order when he or she has committed repeated offences that are harmful to society or particularly bothersome, the special sanction is necessary to protect society against such offences, the risk of further offences of the same type seems particularly likely, and other measures have proven clearly unsuitable.

When assessing the risk of reoffending, emphasis shall be given to the offence committed in the context particularly of the offender's general conduct, illness history, current mental state and relationship with alcohol and drugs.

A person may also be committed to psychiatric care when the offender's state of unaccountability meant that he or she was in factual ignorance, see section 25, or the offender was otherwise in a state not compatible with having intent.

Section 63.Conditions for committing to care severely mentally disabled persons, etc.

Subject to the conditions specified in section 62, any person who is unaccountable pursuant to section 20 second to fourth paragraphs, may be committed to care by court order.

Care pursuant to this section shall be undergone in an expert unit of the specialist health service constituted for the purpose. When in the interests of the judicially committed person and not inadvisable for security reasons, the expert unit may pursuant to further regulations issued by the King enter into an agreement for the execution of care outside the expert unit.

The the judicially committed person may be held against his/her will and be returned in the event of flight, if necessary by force and with the assistance of public authorities. The expert unit has overall responsibility for the execution of compulsory care, including when the special sanction is executed outside the expert unit.

Section 64.Detailed provisions on execution of care

The following provisions of the Mental Health Care Act apply correspondingly to the execution of committal to care insofar as applicable:



The King may issue regulations providing that chapter 9 of the Health and Care Services Act shall apply correspondingly. The King may issue special provisions on applicable administrative proceedings.

The King will issue regulations containing detailed provisions on the execution of care pursuant to section 63, including provisions that identify which measures are subject to review pursuant to the rules in chapter 36 of the Dispute Act.

Section 65.Cessation of sanctions

Psychiatric care pursuant to section 62 and care pursuant to section 63 may be maintained only as long as the condition in section 62 regarding the risk of repetition is met.